Wordless Wednesday

I thought this was just weird.
I think kids would look like prost-a-tots .
How many of you with kids would buy this for your kids?

~Bernie

Comments

  1. Sooooo wrong on soooooo many levels!!!

  2. Galen Pearl says:

    And I thought that the sexuality of toddler and child pageants was a new thing!

  3. I feel slighly creeped out… haha

  4. It's interesting that this type of "thing" would exist already back in the 1950s. I was clueless.

    I saw a news report the other night about how mothers transform their young daughters into these types of prost-a-tots (a quite applicable word, BTW) in the name of beauty pageants or whatever reason is given. It's idiotic parenting at the least, child abuse at the worst. Seriously, why would anyone dress their child like this?

    • I can\’t stand that show Toddlers and Tiaras! I think its the Mom\’s just trying to get the glory days via their child. Its not a good thing at all.

  5. Oh geeze no, not in 2011 and definitely not in 1959. I see sexualizing little girls has been around a lot longer than I thought. Notice the heels she's wearing too. *rolls eyes*.

  6. Yeah, there's a mom out there that would buy these. Anything for her little princess. It's god-awful if you ask me.

  7. Oh I like bachiles' point–it should come with the left strap always falling down. They would definitely look like prost-a-tots. I'm so happy to know that this was going on before 'toddlers and tiaras' *sigh*

  8. Probably the inspiration for those Toddlers & Tiara pageants.

  9. Well since I have boys—no!!! LOL But it is ridiculous. Does it include riding up and squeezing and straps falling down to simulate the real experience just like mommy's????

Speak Your Mind

*

Notify me of followup comments via e-mail. You can also subscribe without commenting.